Multisite Implementation of a Sexual Health Survey and Clinical Decision Support to Promote Adolescent Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening

Abstract

Background Adolescents are at high risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and frequently present to emergency departments (EDs) for care. Screening for STIs using confidential patient-reported outcomes represents an ideal use of electronic screening methodology.

Objectives The objectives of this study were to implement a patient-facing, confidential electronic survey to assess adolescent risk for STIs and consent for testing with integrated provider-facing electronic clinical decision support (CDS) across six geographically dispersed pediatric EDs and evaluate implementation based on survey and CDS usage metrics.

Methods A pilot site provided code for the electronic survey, data query, and CDS templates to six EDs. Institutions identified necessary information technology (IT) personnel, completed the local build, and made modifications to suit individual site workflow variations with all sites successfully deploying the electronic survey with electronic health record (EHR)-embedded CDS.

Results Out of 79,780 eligible adolescents, 6,165 adolescents completed the confidential health survey between April 12, 2021 and September 25, 2022. The CDS was triggered indicating the patient was at risk or consented to STI testing across all six sites 2,058 times. The average percentage of time the CDS was acknowledged by a provider was 81.6% (range 45.7–97.6%). The median number of providers who acknowledged each instance of the CDS was 2.0. STI testing was ordered from the CDS on average 47.3% of the time. CDS acknowledged selection of “other” and “[testing] already ordered” was the most frequent indication STI testing was not ordered from the CDS.

Conclusion Successful deployment of patient-facing screeners with integrated electronic CDS across multiple healthcare institutions is feasible. A combination of different types of IT and informatics expertise with local knowledge of clinical workflows is essential to success.

Keywords

clinical decision support - electronic health record - patient-reported outcomes - pediatrics - emergency medicine

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

This study was approved by each institution's Institutional Review Board (IRB) through a single IRB mechanism with a waiver of parental consent for participation. All study subjects provided informed consent before participation.

^* Denotes co-senior authorship.

Publication History

Received: 20 April 2024

Accepted: 20 November 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
21 November 2024

Article published online:
02 April 2025

• References

• 1 American College of Emergency Physicians. Domestic Family Violence. April 2019. Accessed January 30, 2024 at: https://www.acep.org/patient-care/policy-statements/domestic-family-violence
• 2 Kaltiso SO, Greenbaum VJ, Agarwal M. et al. Evaluation of a screening tool for child sex trafficking among patients with high-risk chief complaints in a pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2018; 25 (11) 1193-1203
• 3 Feldstein DA, Barata I, McGinn T. et al. Disseminating child abuse clinical decision support among commercial electronic health records: effects on clinical practice. JAMIA Open 2023; 6 (02) ooad022
• 4 Haun JN, Alman AC, Melillo C. et al. Using electronic data collection platforms to assess complementary and integrative health patient-reported outcomes: feasibility project. JMIR Med Inform 2020; 8 (06) e15609
• 5 Lavallee DC, Chenok KE, Love RM. et al. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into health care to engage patients and enhance care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016; 35 (04) 575-582
• 6 Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H. et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005; 293 (10) 1223-1238
• 7 Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005; 330 (7494) 765
• 8 Sutton RT, Pincock D, Baumgart DC, Sadowski DC, Fedorak RN, Kroeker KI. An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digit Med 2020; 3: 17
• 9 Barry L, Tighe SM, Griffin A. et al. A qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) exploring the barriers and facilitators to screening in emergency departments using the theoretical domains framework. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23 (01) 1090
• 10 Salwei ME, Carayon P, Hoonakker PLT. et al. Workflow integration analysis of a human factors-based clinical decision support in the emergency department. Appl Ergon 2021; 97: 103498
• 11 Richardson S, Dauber-Decker KL, McGinn T, Barnaby DP, Cattamanchi A, Pekmezaris R. Barriers to the use of clinical decision support for the evaluation of pulmonary embolism: qualitative interview study. JMIR Hum Factors 2021; 8 (03) e25046
• 12 Weinstock HS, Kreisel KM, Spicknall IH, Chesson HW, Miller WC. STI prevalence, incidence, and costs in the United States: new estimates, new approach. Sex Transm Dis 2021; 48 (04) 207
• 13 Wilson KM, Klein JD. Adolescents who use the emergency department as their usual source of care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000; 154 (04) 361-365
• 14 Centers for Disease Control. Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021. July 2021. Accessed January 20, 2024 at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/adolescents.htm
• 15 Gearhart AS, Badolato GM, Goyal MK. Adolescent attitudes toward sexually transmitted infection screening in the emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 2020; 36 (10) e573-e575
• 16 Goyal MK, Shea JA, Hayes KL. et al. Development of a sexual health screening tool for adolescent emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med 2016; 23 (07) 809-815
• 17 Goyal MK, Fein JA, Badolato GM. et al. A computerized sexual health survey improves testing for sexually transmitted infection in a pediatric emergency department. J Pediatr 2017; 183: 147-152.e1
• 18 Miller MK, Mollen C, Behr K. et al. Development of a novel computerized clinical decision support system to improve adolescent sexual health care provision. Acad Emerg Med 2019; 26 (04) 420-433
• 19 Howe JL, Reed JL, Adams KT. et al. Workflow analysis driven recommendations for integration of electronically-enhanced sexually transmitted infection screening tools in pediatric emergency departments. J Med Syst 2020; 44 (12) 206
• 20 Sharma H. How short or long should be a questionnaire for any research? Researchers dilemma in deciding the appropriate questionnaire length. Saudi J Anaesth 2022; 16 (01) 65-68
• 21 McGreevey III JD, Mallozzi CP, Perkins RM, Shelov E, Schreiber R. Reducing alert burden in electronic health records: state of the art recommendations from four health systems. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11 (01) 1-12
• 22 Pasternak RH, Alderman EM, English A. 21st Century Cures Act ONC Rule: implications for adolescent care and confidentiality protections. Pediatrics 2023; 151 (Suppl. 01) e2022057267K
• 23 Bonett S, Petsis D, Dowshen N, Bauermeister J, Wood SM. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexually transmitted infection/human immunodeficiency virus testing among adolescents in a large pediatric primary care network. Sex Transm Dis 2021; 48 (07) e91-e93